U.S. Fifth Circuit Denies Remand under Local Controversy Exception where Class Definition Does Not Clearly Limit Membership

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

Plaintiff Arbuckle Mountain Ranch sued for a putative class of post-foreclosure owners of disputed oil and gas interests. The putative class allegedly includes “between three thousand and five thousand” members “spread out across the United States.” Arbuckle claims the defendants’ oil and gas leases automatically terminated upon foreclosure, and the defendants’ continued operation of these wellheads therefore constitutes trespass and …

U.S. Fifth Circuit Clarifies Standard for Remand of “Mass Tort” under CAFA

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

A lawsuit alleging personal and property damages stemming from oil pipe-cleaning operations was filed in Louisiana state court and removed under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”). The district court allowed jurisdictional discovery, and then ordered the case remanded to state court on the ground that the defendants had not met their burden of showing that at least one plaintiff …

Court in Southern District of New York Rejects Defendant’s Challenge to “Ascertainability”

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

The Court originally denied plaintiff’s motion to certify a state-wide class of persons who were charged 75 cents per page by the defendant, HealthPort Technologies, for copies of medical records. See 2015 WL 6873399 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2015). The Court noted, however, that it stood ready to certify a narrower class of those who requested records from Beth Israel Medical …

Seventh Circuit Directs Certification of a Negative Value FDCPA Case

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

Plaintiff brought a putative class action alleging that the defendant violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) when it sought to collect or settle debts that were not legally enforceable because the statute of limitations had run. The proposed Class Definition was: (a) all individuals in Illinois (b) to whom [the defendant] (c) sent a letter seeking to collect …

U.S. Fifth Circuit Declines to Extend Class Release to Claims for Which No Recovery was Afforded

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

In a Per Curiam decision arising out of the Chinese Drywall Litigation, the U lipitor weight loss.S. Fifth Circuit allowed a claim for stigma damages to go forward, despite the class release of claims “known and unknown, arising from, or otherwise related to” Chinese Drywall. “When deciding whether Mangiarelli’s stigma claims are within the scope of the Global and Banner …

Ninth Circuit Reverses Denial of Class Certification on Restitution Claim from Google AdWords Program

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

“Pulaski alleges that Google misled advertisers by failing to disclose the placement of AdWords ads on parked domains and error pages…. The district court denied certification because it found that the putative class did not meet the predominance requirement. It explained that questions regarding which advertisers are entitled to restitution in the first instance, and the amount of restitution owed …

U.S. District Court in Minnesota Certifies Class of Financial Institutions against Target for massive Data Breach, applying Minnesota Law to Class Claims

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

Plaintiffs issued credit and debit cards to consumers who, in turn, used those cards at Target stores during the period of the 2013 data breach. Alleging negligence, and violations of Minnesota’s Plastic Security Card Act, the putative class representatives suffered injury in the form of replacing cards for their customers, reimbursing fraud losses, and taking various other remedial steps in …

U.S. Second Circuit Reverses Certification of Bondholder Class based on Ascertainability Concerns

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

“After Argentina defaulted on between $80 and $100 billion of sovereign debt in 2001, numerous bondholders, including Appellee here and those in the related Seijas cases, filed suit. In Appellee’s suit, the District Court entered an order on May 29, 2009, that certified a class under a continuous holder requirement, i.e., the class contained only those individuals who, like Appellee, …

U.S. Fifth Circuit Affirms Securities Fraud Class Against BP for Post-Spill Misrepresentations

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the BP Oil Spill Litigation, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

“[T]he plaintiffs’ theory of liability is that BP misrepresented the Spill’s flow rate. The theory of damages is that the stock price was inflated as a result of BP’s misrepresentations, as revealed by six corrective events. Some of those events are unequivocally connected to the alleged misrepresentations, i.e., a Coast Guard statement several days after the spill reporting that the …

In Class Action to Enforce Coupons that Were Not Being Honored, U.S. Seventh Circuit Approves Award of Fees Based on Lodestar Method, as Opposed to the Value of Coupons Redeemed

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

“When Congress enacted the Class Action Fairness Act, one of its targets was abusive ‘coupon settlements,’ where defendants and class counsel agree to provide coupons of dubious value to class members but to pay class counsel with cash. The potential for abuse is greatest when the coupons have value only if a class member is willing to do business again …