Louisiana Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on Intentional Spoliation Claim

In What's New in E-Discovery and Spoliation?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

In summary: “The trial court found Ms. Fiveash failed to present any evidence to establish that Defendants intentionally destroyed evidence with the purpose of depriving her of its use at trial. Louisiana jurisprudence has held summary judgment based on subjective facts like intent is rarely appropriate. The trial court incorrectly relied on self-serving and conclusory affidavits that Defendants offered in …

Attorney Can Be Sued for Copyright Infringement When Using Substantial Portions of Another’s Brief

In Legal Ethics & Professionalism, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

A lawyer copied “substantial portions” of a brief drafted by a co-defendant in a patent case, who was “the owner of a valid and registered copyright” for its brief.  Judge Hatter, sitting in the Central District of California, rejected the defendant’s claim of “fair use”. First, the defendant “did not add new expression, meaning or message to Newegg’s draft brief. …

Northern District of Illinois Certifies FDCPA Claims, Rejecting Challenges based on Ascertainability and Article III

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

A debt collector’s “attempt to impose percentage-based collection costs or fees absent a prior express agreement violates the FDCPA, unless such costs are allowed by applicable state law…. NRA contends that the proposed class is not ascertainable because ‘to the extent liability, if any, turns on whether or not the “costs” charged to each putative class member were expressly authorized …

Magistrate Judge in the Middle District of Louisiana Discusses Limitations on Discovery of Social Media

In What's New in E-Discovery and Spoliation?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

“Movants are seeking relevant information posted on social media directly pertaining to Plaintiff’s claims in the Petition. Such social media is generally discoverable…. “The issue here is whether Plaintiff shared relevant information to the claims and defenses in this action with third parties. Regardless of whether Plaintiff emplaced privacy settings on her social media postings, these postings were freely shared …

U.S. District Court in Hawaii Finds Formal Trial Plan Unnecessary in Absence of Individualized Proof Problems

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

A class action was brought against Lloyds Bank regarding the issuance of certain dual currency, or International Mortgage System (“IMS”), loans.  The U.S. District Court in Hawaii certified a class, and the U.S. Ninth Circuit denying Lloyds’ Rule 23(f) petition. Lloyds then filed a Motion to Compel Trial Plan “illustrating the expected course of proceedings at trial and showing that …

U.S. Seventh Circuit Affirms Certification of Anti-Trust Action; Rejects Application of Previous Class Release

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

Plaintiffs brought suit alleging that the defendants agreed to restrict the supply of containerboard by cutting capacity, slowing back production, taking downtime, idling plants, and tightly restricting inventory, thereby leading to an increase in the price of containerboard.  A nationwide class of direct purchasers was certified, and the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. First, the court noted that the …

Magistrate Peck in the Southern District of New York Discusses (again) the Benefits of Predictive Coding, yet Declines to Compel the Producing Party

In What's New in E-Discovery and Spoliation?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

Recounting several prior decisions on the subject, Magistrate Judge Pack noted that TAR (Technology Assisted Review) (or predictive coding) is, in general, “cheaper, more efficient and superior to keyword searching. In March 2009, the ‘dark ages’ in terms of ediscovery advances, this Court described problems with keywords and the need for ‘careful thought, quality control, testing, and cooperation with opposing …

District Court Judge in Peurto Rico Orders Party to Re-Produce Billing Records in Excel Format, as Requested

In What's New in E-Discovery and Spoliation?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

In civil RICO case, the plaintiff requested billing records in Excel format. The defendants produced the records in PDF. When plaintifff filed a motion to compel, the defendants argued that the parties had never agreed upon a specific format, and that the billing software permitted only PDF. Compelling the defendants to re-produce the billing data in Excel format, the Court …

District Court Judge in Washington Sanctions Attorney for Side-Stepping Proportionalty Requirements

In What's New in E-Discovery and Spoliation?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

In a FDCPA case, the defendants moved to either compel discovery or exclude medical evidence presented by the plaintiff. Sanctioning the defendants, the Court observed as follows:   “Defendants cited caselaw that analyzed the version of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) that existed before the highly publicized amendments took effect on December 1, 2015. As this court indicated at …

U.S. Tax Court Addresses the Sufficiency of Production where Predictive Coding is Employed

In What's New in E-Discovery and Spoliation?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

“When responding to a document request, technology has rendered the traditional approach to document review impracticable. The traditional method is labor intensive, with people reviewing documents to discern what is (or is not) responsive, with the responsive documents then reviewed for privilege, and with the responsive and non-privileged documents being produced. When reviewing documents in the dozens, hundreds, or low …