Southern District of New York Certifies (b)(1) Class Claims under ERISA for Mismanagement of 401(k) Plan

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in ERISA Litigation?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

“Defendants object to class certification under Rule 23(b)(1) as improper in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decisions in LaRue and Wal-Mart. Although courts are split over whether Rule 23(b)(1)(B) remains an appropriate class vehicle for fiduciary-breach claims under ERISA, a majority have held that it is…. “Defendants argue that, because the Supreme Court in LaRue held that §1132(a)(2) allows …

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Rejects Challenge to Adequacy Based on Pursuit of Only Statutory Damages in FDCPA Case

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

In FDCPA case, the district court held that the Named Plaintiff was an inadequate class representative because he sought only statutory damages, while other members of the class might have suffered actual damages. The U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal reversed: “As an initial matter, the district court’s stated reason for finding Dickens inadequate — that he sought only statutory …

U.S. Fifth Circuit Affirms Class of Inmates for Injunctive Relief over Temperatures in Holding Areas

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

Defendants’ overarching objection to the district court’s certification focuses on the common contention that “excessive heat constitutes a condition of confinement that poses a substantial risk of serious harm to the health of inmates.”  Defendants do not contest that putative class members are all exposed to essentially the same temperatures. Defendants also do not contest that Pack Unit temperatures, particularly …

U.S. Fifth Circuit Dismisses Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction Where Appellant Fails to Timely Object in the District Court

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

“The class members get nothing. The attorneys get their fees. A class member objects, but untimely. Consequently, we lack appellate jurisdiction.” Explaining more fully: “The Supreme Court has often underscored that only parties to a lawsuit, or those that properly become parties, may appeal an adverse judgment. But then the Devlin Court came along and concluded that it should carve …

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Application of American Pipe Tolling to a Statute of Repose

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

In 2007 and 2008, Lehman Brothers raised capital through several public securities offerings. In 2008, a putative class action asserted claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act, alleging that the registration statements included material misstatements or omissions. Because the complaint was filed on behalf of all persons who purchased the identified securities, petitioner was a member of the putative class. In …

U.S. Fifth Circuit Affirms Class-Wide Damages Model, Reverses Certification of Fraud Claims, and Remands for Further Consideration of Pot. Waiver Issue and Its Pot. Effect on the Question of Adequacy

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

In a case against Progessive for breach of contract, statutory insurance law, and fraud claims relating to the adjustment of total-loss claims, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Progressive’s challenge under Comcast: “Plaintiffs’ liability theory is that Defendant unlawfully used WorkCenter Total Loss (WCTL) to calculate the base value of total loss vehicles. Plaintiffs claim that using WCTL, …

U.S. Seventh Circuit Dismisses Class Action for Lack of Article III Standing against Manufacturers of Eye Drops Approved by the FDA

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in Product Liability Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

A district court judge sitting in the Southern District of Illinois certified eight classes the manufacturers of eye drops that are allegedly unnecessarily large, in violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act and the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, because each eye drop exceeds 16 microliters, while the optimal size of an eye drop for treatment of glaucoma is 16 microliters, …

Louisiana Fourth Circuit Emphasizes that, in Considering a Motion to Decertify, the Court Should Consider the Prejudice to the Parties at that Stage of the Proceedings

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

The Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal recently articulated ten principles relating to a court’s decision on a Motion to Decertify a class: 1. A trial court’s decision denying a decertification motion is an interlocutory judgment that is immediately appealable. 2. A trial court’s decision denying a motion to decertify a class is one involving a valid exercise of discretion …

U.S. Ninth Circuit Affirms Certification of RICO Claims against Credit Card Processing Service Providers

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

Small businesses and business owners who leased “point of sale” credit and debit card processing equipment brought two related class claims against Leasing Defendants, a group of entities who financed their acquisition of such equipment.  As a matter of general background: Credit and debit card transactions are processed through financial networks called interchanges that are run by entities such as …

Ninth Circuit Rejects Stand-Alone ‘Administrative Feasibility’ Requirement in Addition to the Superiority considerations under Rule 23(b)(3)

In What's New in Class Action Law?, What's New in the Courts by gravierhouseLeave a Comment

Plaintiffs brought a putative class action against ConAgra on behalf of consumers who purchased Wesson-brand cooking oil products labeled “100% Natural” which they allege was false or misleading, as Wesson oils are made from bioengineered ingredients that are “not natural”.  The district corut granted class certification, and the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. “The language of Rule 23 …